Help for Hamilton?

One of the biggest questions surrounding John Hamilton is “what spurs his hate-filled bile to spring forth so unceasingly?” He’s completely bereft of reason, makes ludicrous and illogical claims with absolutely zero supporting evidence and ignores any irrefutable evidence sent his way, then he resorts to writing vile insults to anyone who helpfully points out all the mistakes he’s made.

Even the most cursory look over John Hamilton’s comments and postings will reveal the words of a man in serious need of some form of psychotherapy.

Uncontrollable rage issues, paranoia, delusions of grandeur, pathological lying: all are traits which John is exhibiting on an almost daily basis.

Perhaps it’s time for John to seek professional help. He certainly needs it.

Advertisements

93 thoughts on “Help for Hamilton?

  1. Well what seems to be an issue is Anger Management, looking at studies on this subject it seems that it happens mainly to the male sex, especially men that feel impotent in their current job role. It is caused by the feelings generated when passed over for promotion, for instance, or when you feel threatened either for real or in your imagination. Normally feelings are masked but when alcohol releases your inhibitions and the mask slips true feelings of inadequacy surface especially at silly o’clock in the morning, it is even more apparent when you can hide your identity behind a computer keyboard so believing you will never be held accountable for your actions.

    • Very interesting, Barry. I guess it’s the whole deflection thing, of wanting to be angry at a partner or a colleague or a boss, but being unable to do so due to various fears, therefore the anger is directed towards other people as some form of release.

  2. Why does the behaviour persist, answer because it is a kind of power rush or ego trip to be a troll. Being online is a place that is largely free of perceived consequences… an insecure person can get a sense of power online, without ever having to face someone directly. With the Internet being a world of imagination and fantasy for some, cowardly users can forge an alter ego for themselves, and act out their feelings of anger and inadequacy. It’s sad and unfortunate that our advanced communications also brings out the darker side of many people

    • Agreed. The constant need to insult and belittle others for imagined failings on their part speaks of a deep-rooted sense of insecurity. It’s a shame that a medium such as the Internet is misused in such a way, using it purely to abuse others from behind a keyboard.

  3. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA It’s almost endearing to watch a laughable fuckwit trying to protect a lying cunt.

    Now lets see, the lying cunt James cannot defend hi libelous/slanderous lies, and is repeatedly challenged to do so, and seeks protection from a worthless cock sucker called Barnes, Seems James will try to cover the fact he has nothing of value to say by any means the poor lil cunt can think of.

    Shame his best attempt at a protector is as worthless as he is. Now, to return to the real world,

    So, once again, if you weren’t forced to remove them (which you clearly were 😉 ) why pray tell would you remove the lies you posted, while leaving all the rest of your lies intact….

    Perhaps you’d like to tell us all again about FB removing people from groups, and having a VAST army of people personally checking the whiny protestations of dumb useless fucktards such as Scott HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA James, you really are the most worthless piece of human sewage I have EVER encountered 🙂 No wonder you only post where you are heavily protected!

    Your a lying cunt James, you prove it daily post by post 🙂

  4. when you examine the many people he attacks one wonders why someone so irrelevant attacks with such bile on such a regular basis. Take Louise Oldfield for instance, she runs a successful B&B in Margate (at least according to Tripadvisor) yet he goes out of his way to call her a gouging B&B owner. The facts don/t add up gouging implies that she fleeces her customers but Tripadvisor quotes say people are more than satisfied with what she provides. Are her prices too high? No because the Sands is more expensive and he ignores that property. So in what way can he justify his comments. The answer seems that reality doesn’t seem to matter in his mind he seems disassociated from reality. The only thing his “victims” have in common is that they stand up to his bullying ways because in the end his opinions do not matter at all and that makes him impotent. His opinion might matter if he were prepared to engage in the real world and not hide behind his keyboard.

    • I totally agree, Barry. His targets seem completely disparate and almost entirely unconnected from each other. The only common denominator seems to be that John singles them out for reprehensibly vile comments and insults, as you say, from the safety of hiding behind his keyboard.

      I did wonder if there were other reasons behind his attacks on these people, such as opposing or completing business interests, specifically in the instance of Louise Oldfield as John’s comments about her B&B seemed completely unrelated to absolutely everything else John harps on about. There does seem to be a business link (one of his followers does own a competing business and unsurprisingly seems quite happy to have slanderous insults levelled at his competitor) but that doesn’t explain everything else John writes.

      I’ve reached the conclusion that he’s a very angry, likely psychopathic individual, who actually needs to insult and belittle others in order to get through the day.

      Very sad indeed.

  5. That’s easy James, I loath liars, bullshitters, gougers and worthless cunts, all 3 definitions which fit you to perfection. Anyone charging the thick end of £200 a night for a B&B in Margate, whilst claiming to support locals, and the High Street, whilst employing nobody, and sourcing over pricing breakfasts from supermarkets really deserves to be exposed as the gougers that fleece visitors they clearly are.

    Where have I mentioned Oldfield in relation to the gouging of Margate B&B owners James? Unlike you, I don’t simply single out people I dislike, and make up lies about them. My posts are factual and accurate, get Barnes to help you look up those words, as they clearly have no meaning to you whatsoever.

    Once again James, you are proved to be a lying cunt, only capable of posting inaccurate bullshit in a heavily protected environment.

    Slandered/libeled any other successful Kent companies and been made to take down any other comments since you were forced to remove your lies about Cardy’s James 😉

    (I see your mutt has made a comment James, but as he’s even more worthless than you are, I haven’t wasted any of my valuable time reading it )

  6. The confusing thing about the posting is its irrelevance to the subject at hand. The feeling is that he has been so used to getting what he wants that the denial of his point of view is hard to take. The continual stating that his points are the only important matters at hand show he is used to having his word listened to. In this medium its as if a ghost is speaking there is no relevant expertise he can use to make his points meaningful. If he tries to explain his experience and expertise he stands the very real chance he will be exposed.
    BTW I understand Ann Barnes has had his blog & utterances passed to her to see if the police will take action.

    • I was going to say that one of the things I’d missed out was narcissism. There’s more than a tinge of rampant egotism in the fact that only John’s points are valid to him and that he completely ignores irrefutable proof because it disproves his viewpoint.

      The inability to permit alternative viewpoints and to insult anyone who dares to offer one suggests a very fragile ego, which John seems desperate to defend at all costs.

      I would be interested to see what Ann Barnes says, as John has made several slanderous/libellous comments (such as the ones removed by Facebook). Perhaps the end result will be that they suggest some form of psychiatric assistance for John, which would certainly be useful.

  7. I await you posting something factual James, that’s worth dealing with, so far it’s just your usual menu lies and obvious bullshit.

    Action James…. you mean I may get an award for exposing a lying bullshitting cunt such as you, excellent, it’s about time people dealing with worthless cock suckers such as you were better rewarded.

    Perhaps they will then deal with the fraud you attempt to inflict on the poor residents of Thanet, that would indeed be a happy day 🙂

  8. It seems Geoff that hammy’s small circle of friends is a little smaller today. He will soon be “billy no mates”, when that happens I wonder who he will turn to for support as he has alienated so many people. I wonder if we can find him a good therapist?

    • Perhaps, Barry. I would say that a very quick Google search I did when writing the post showed that there is a lot of help out there for people like John, but then that would actually require him to research something properly, which he’s shown no signs of doing yet.

      Maybe, as you say, we should find details for him and leave them here so he can seek the help he so desperately needs?

  9. Friends? You think I regard people on here as friends? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Oh dear James, what a tragic life you clearly lead HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Wonder if you will EVER write anything factual ya poor daft wanker.

  10. Imagine anyone on here being a friend of a disembodied voice typing away in a dark room. friendship only occurs when people have shared memories. friendship is about mutual respect honed over time. Lonely people do not have shared experiences but I imagine that may be part of hammy;s problem as he seems to believe that people listen to him. Even the likes of Latchford and Driver, who swap political allegiances like they switch underwear, at least have the courage to face their public at the hustings. I cannot imagine someone who hates so much being able to face their audience. They are more used to sniping from behind their curtains anonymously.
    What they do not realise is their words are meaningless without the courage to face their victims. His insults are about as deadly as a puff of air with no substance behind them.

    • There’s more than a tinge of rampant egotism with John’s comments. It seems very similar to that of a spoiled young child who doesn’t understand that they aren’t the most fascinating individual in the world and can’t accept that everyone doesn’t want to spend every single waking moment talking to them. Children like that also seem to think that making up outrageous insults and lies about you will hurt you, because that is what hurts them; when their minds cannot conceive of a way to respond, they lash out. Which is exactly what John does. Unable to form a cogent response to the comments made to and about him, he lashes out in the way he thinks will hurt the authors the most, not realising that it genuinely only amuses, rather than wounds.

  11. You know what James, you make yourself look the fucktard we all know you to be without any help form anyone else.

    You make an attempt to show I have a “band of friends” and it’s diminishing because me and Peter Checksfield don;t agree on something, your very next post, you whine on at length that i don;t have any friends….HAHAHAHAHAHAHA You are truly worthless James, even when you try to attack me, you end up looking the fool you are.

    For the record,. there is nobody on FB or the blogs whom I would class as a friend. The real world is where I live my boy, not the fairy land you SO wish was true. Any more lies to post about prominent Kent businesses today James, or are you now to afraid of their legal teams?

  12. For the record (as someone mentioned my name), I’ve never regard “John Hamilton” as a friend… or an enemy. He’s just someone whom I (mostly) agree with over Arlington Tesco. I’m no longer even on FB as I became sick of all the petty squabbling, but I did attempt to steer his “Yes to Arlington Tesco” page away from the nastiness and towards the facts.

    As for Pleasurama, etc, I have no strong opinion apart from the fact that I wish they’d hurry up and do SOMETHING, whether it’s housing, a fun fair or whatever. I haven’t looked into it enough to know how right or wrong Barry is over things, as Margate tends to be my priority.

    Love, Peace and Tesco! ; )

    • Hi Peter,

      I can readily imagine that all of the squabbling became too much, in some cases it just became a tit-for-tat war of words.

      I am sorry that you felt you had to leave Facebook due to it; obviously Facebook is just one tiny part of anyone’s life, but it is still a shame that the actions of others can make someone abandon what is meant to be a social tool.

      We obviously disagree on things like the proposed Tesco superstore at Arlington, but that does not mean we can’t be civil to each other. It’s just such a shame that John does not seem to realise that other people can have perfectly valid, but differing, points of view.

      Just like with Pleasurama, I think everyone agrees that *something* needs to be done, it’s just that they disagree on precisely what!

      All the best,

      Geoff

    • Peter how I wish Pleasurama was about what gets built there but it is not. It is about the removal of some “developers” that haven’t developed a thing in 11 years. It isn’t even about the builders who seem to have fallen foul of “developers” who seem to have had no intention of developing anything as their track record shows. (Cardy are the 4th set of builders on site since inception). When the current “developers” are removed then a discussion can be held over what gets put there instead. At that point FORS will have a say (as promised by TDC)

  13. As someone posted on another blog Hamilton is a user and abuser. He is not someone who can form a long term friendships with, rather acquaintances who he can use to get what he wants. And don’t get in his way or else the abuse will start.

  14. Despite James’s lies about Cardys (that they forced him to remove, and quite rightly so), clearly he has not a shred of evidence to back up his laughable claims re Keegan, SFP, Cardy’s or indeed anyone else. He is simply a proven lying cunt, who really should be ignored, as the VAST majority of Thanet already do.

    FORS is simply a collection of friends who have been dragged into a FB group they have never visited, run by a TINY cadre of worthless clowns who live in a world where anythign can be built, an 0 cost to the tax payer, and be offered at 0 cost to any visitor who chooses to go there. Or perhaps we could have another heritage centre, I believe they have suggested a total of 4 so far/

    It entertains me that he thinks long term friendships are based on me exposing the lies of worthless cock suckers such as him, and foolish no marks such as the occutards, I Have no friendship with Peter, we merely agree on a great deal of subjects. That you think you have friends on here James is VERY funny, and no a little tragic.

    Now James, what other bullshit would you like to post re any other long standing Kent companies, that they can force you to remove when your proven to be the lying cock sucker we know you to be 🙂

  15. hammy must be the most boring person ever, when is he going to post any original research, he is even calling someone with a reasonable objection to a planning proposal a nimby. Someone Holyer says has a cogent argument and wishes all the best. I get the feeling that anyone, no matter why, who objects to a planning proposal gets his knee jerk reaction.
    I also get the feeling that he doesn’t actually care about Pleasurama because if he did he would examine everything posted, all he cares about is attacking the people that do care. I believe someone posted that he may have points to make however he spoils it with his hatred.

    • One thing I’ve noticed is that John Hamilton doesn’t complain about the “NIMBYs” if they’re Tories… Cllr Simon Moores has been campaigning against a proposed Tesco in Westgate-on-Sea (probably to gain popularity), and it transpired that he misled everybody over the size of the store by confusing metres with feet! Now, it could’ve just been a genuine mistake (which is still in itself worrying for someone who helps make TDC planning decisions), but could you imagine JH’s reaction if Ian or Louise or Christine had made the same “mistake”? So come on John, how about treating ALL NIMBYs the same?!

  16. As has been stated many times, in many places James, you really are the most tedious, boring, pointless, irrelevant lying fuckwit that FB has ever spawned. I STILL await your first honest, truthful post that shows wrongdoing re Keegan. or anything to do with pleasurama James. Vut, as we know, you have fuck, and have never had any more than fuck all, bullshit and outright lies, which fortunately, those being libeled/slandered are forcing you to remove, and rightly so.

    I await something of value from you James, but we know you’re a lying cunt, so I expect little if anything 😉

    Peter, Once again,. I have no real opinion re a Tesco’s in Westgate, or indeed anywhere where I am unlikely to ever use it. I have not followed the story, or the usual planning objections, and thus I’m not really in a position to make a comment. Unlike James, I do not prognosticate, make up bullshit or outright lie on issues where my knowledge is limited.

    Unlike the majority of the nimbys, I am not a professional Tesco’s campaigner, unlike those who whine that they kill high streets, them happily go n shop there. Thus Peter, for me it’s really not a political issue, it’s an issue over a supermarket ion Margate that the VAST majority want to see built, and a TINY minority of nimbys, along with gouging Margate B&B owners try to stop for their own selfish reasons.

    I wonder how long it will be before the usual suspects rally behind the wicked witch of the North, and start whining about he proposed hotel at near the Turner 🙂

    • Many people in Westgate opposed Tesco because they were misled over the size, but this obviously doesn’t bother you either way as it’s nearly 2 miles away… just as Arlington Tesco doesn’t bother Dr Moores either way as it’s 2 miles away from him. There’s a pattern emerging here!

      If you’re refering to Ms Oldfield, I believe she supports the proposed seafront hotel next to the TC (as do I, though I’d prefer it on The Lido site!).

      • Peter I know hammy sets great store by “the name at the beginning of each post” but do you think that is his real name or is he posting as anon

      • Peter, John has said before that he doesn’t live in Margate, but visits Margate often and drives past Arlington, hence why he supports the proposed Tesco there (he believes it will aid with regenerating the area). But he has also said he wants things which will improve Margate and Thanet in general, so if he doesn’t point out Simon Moores’ stance against a proposed Tesco in Westgate-on-Sea (hardly a million miles away from Arlington), then there’s more than a slight tinge of hypocrisy there.

        As you say, curious how he only has an issue with non-Tory types. But judging by his recent diatribes on anyone displaying even a hint of non-far-right tendencies, that’s perhaps not too surprising.

  17. As I say Peter, I have no real opinion on a Tesco’s in Westgate, If I’ve been to Westgate more than 3 times in my life I’ll be surprised. Unlike fuckwits like James, I restrict my comments to subjects I have knowledge of, rather than his normal MO of spouting irrelevant and dishonest bullshit.

    I support the hotel proposal in Margate next to the Turner, as I do the proposal for a hotel in the Arlington development,, it’s CLEARLY a step forward. I don;t believe the wicked witch of the north has yet whined about the plan, but i suspect I know what’s coming.

    More bullshit you have 0 evidence to support I see James, tell me, which Kent company will be threatening you to have you remove lies about them next 😉 HAHAHAHAHAHA Oh James, you really are the definition of a pointless cunt.

    • OK, JH, you restrict yourself to comments that you have knowledge of: I’ve given you the knowledge that Simon Moores gave people the wrong dimensions of the store. So, 2 quick questions:

      (a) Do you accept that his “mistake” is genuine, despite the fact that he hasn’t apologised to anybody?

      (b) If Ian, Louise, Christine or James made the same “mistake” then would you also accept that their mistake was genuine?

      Seems very hypercritical to me that you don’t call Simon a “c*nt” for making a mistake!

      PS. As others have pointed out, you’ve said yourself that you don’t actually live in Margate. So when you visit which way do you come if it isn’t via Westgate?

  18. PS, what pattern is that Peter, people simply involving themselves in issues relevant to their lives and locality, now there’s a thing, perhaps if people simply worried about their own lives, not everyone elses, more would get done. I wonder how many of the nimbys are simply washed up occutards that found a new home 😉

  19. PPPS It’s unlikely the Lido site will EVER be developed. Simple fact is that as the wicked witch of the north decided it should be listed, it would now be WAY to expensive and WAY to difficult to do anything with it. But hey, at least Margate’s “heritage” won’t ever change, it will always me a derelict site that could and should be recycled into a new use for this century.

    • I believe it was listed before she even moved here, but even if it wasn’t I think it’s quite right that The Lido and The Winter Gardens have been listed (& it’s quite right that Arlington House was NOT listed!).

  20. Barry, I don’t know for sure whether “John” uses his real name or not, so until I have concrete evidence either way I’m not going to make assumptions.

  21. Name: WINTER GARDENS
    List entry Number: 1392676
    Location
    WINTER GARDENS, FORT CRESCENT
    The building may lie within the boundary of more than one authority.
    County District District Type Parish
    Kent Thanet District Authority
    National Park: Not applicable to this List entry.
    Grade: II
    Date first listed: 28-Jul-2008
    Name: REMAINS OF THE CLIFTON BATHS AT CLIFTONVILLE LIDO

    List entry Number: 1392729

    Location
    REMAINS OF THE CLIFTON BATHS AT CLIFTONVILLE LIDO, ETHELBERT TERRACE
    The building may lie within the boundary of more than one authority.
    County District District Type Parish
    Kent Thanet District Authority
    National Park: Not applicable to this List entry.
    Grade: II
    Date first listed: 01-Sep-2008

  22. Tip 1 : Never resort to name calling – even if your opponent does. You must attack your opponent’s argument – not their person. As soon as you begin to criticize your opponent, it becomes obvious that you have run out of ways to defend your view. These types of insults (ad hominem) are a sure way to lose a debate. You should be pleased if your opponent resorts to this feeble attempt to escape the real debate as it means you are close to victory.

  23. I think you need to stop taking on James’s “research” methods Peter, taking a guess then bullshitting really is beneath you. Sadly, listing simply guarantees the Lido will one day disappear, and the wintergardens is on a long slow decline to eventual dereliction, all because the wicked witch of the north believes she should be able to pass judgement on what progress Thanet should be allowed to make.

    James, the ONLY advice I could ever need from you, would be how to post bullshit, and try to pass it off as truth 🙂 you are and always will be a lying cunt James, there is no debate, it’s a fact, and as we no, you have NO idea what a fact is 😉

    • Erm, I think you’re the one who claimed that it was Louise Oldfield who was behind the listing of The Lido, and James proved you wrong…

      Looking forward to your reply to my questions at 20:05, or are you speechless for once?

  24. “Wednesday, 20 August 2008
    Let’s set up the Margate Conservation Area Advisory Group
    Thanet Council has had a bit of a hard time finding people to come together to form groups to go alongside the designated Conservation Areas. There is a requirement for there to be an advisory group comprised of lay people, i.e. not council officials, to fulfill a number of functions. TDC put a list of the possible role of the groups:

    So far, it was put over to the Margate Civic Society to see if they could drum up interest in setting up a Margate CAAG. However, much ringing and writing of emails to the Society, what I got in return was that they don’t know anything about the CAAGs. So back to TDC. There I was informed that it might be a good idea me to try to organise one myself and take it from there.

    So, here it is. The call for anyone interested to join me in setting up Margate’s Conservation Area Advisory Group. Please email me and lets see if we can get this ball rolling. Designated Conservation Areas require management and the involvement of the communities living in them.”

    Once again James it seems you’re talking utter bollocks, nothing new for a proven lying cunt such as yourself, Hopefully Peter won;t be guillible enough to take your bullshit at face value for long 😉

    • wow seeing as getting something listed takes forever she managed something before the 20/8/2008. the words are lets set up not we have set up. getting something listed takes a long time hammy not minutes

      • Margate Conservation Area Advisory Group pray tell what this has to do with the process to get a property listed. I think the clue is the “conservation area” part

      • When we receive an application we notify the owner and local planning authority of it.
        At this stage owners and the local planning authority can forward on to us any further information or comments they might have on the special architectural and historic interest of the building. This will help us with the assessment

        Once we have completed our research, and possibly a site visit, to find out more about the proposed candidate for listing we will put together an initial report which will be sent out to the owner, applicant and local planning authority for consultation. The initial report sets out the history and background information about the building proposed for listing, and will form the basis for our assessment about whether it has the special interest necessary for listing.
        Consultees will be asked to send in their responses within 21 days from the date of the consultation letter. We have provided guidance to help you draft your response which can be downloaded (under Related Documents)
        It is important to note that we can only consider comments on the special architectural or historic interest of a building
        Owners using planning consultants to assist them may want to take this deadline into consideration

        We will then consider all representations made before finalising our recommendation to the Secretary of State for the DCMS. The decision on whether to list is taken by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport.

        Although we will follow this process in the majority of cases, if it can be demonstrated that the building or site is at substantial risk of imminent damage or destruction, then English Heritage may choose not to notify or consult the owner or local authority.

        Doesn’t sound like a quick process does it?

  25. Think you need to see James for what he is Peter, a lying fucktard who relies on people believing his bullshit without question 😉

    • Tip 1 : Never resort to name calling – even if your opponent does. You must attack your opponent’s argument – not their person. As soon as you begin to criticize your opponent, it becomes obvious that you have run out of ways to defend your view. These types of insults (ad hominem) are a sure way to lose a debate. You should be pleased if your opponent resorts to this feeble attempt to escape the real debate as it means you are close to victory.

  26. Oh dear James, seems this claim of your’s

    “Barry James on September 17, 2013 at 21:15 said:

    just had it confirmed it was TDC conservation group”

    Is exposed as your usual lies and bullshit, no surprise really 🙂

    Oh yes Peter, your questions;

    (a) Do you accept that his “mistake” is genuine, despite the fact that he hasn’t apologised to anybody?

    No idea, have read virtually nothing re Westgate, and unlike James I am not prepared to guess, and try to pass of that guess as a fact.

    (b) If Ian, Louise, Christine or James made the same “mistake” then would you also accept that their mistake was genuine?

    See question A

    Seems very hypercritical to me that you don’t call Simon a “c*nt” for making a mistake!

    Seems that Simon isn;t a lying cunt, as James has been proven on many occasions. Perhaps he would like to repeat his lies re Cardy’s that they forced him to remove…

    PS. As others have pointed out, you’ve said yourself that you don’t actually live in Margate. So when you visit which way do you come if it isn’t via Westgate?

    By a variety of routes Peter, there are more roads leading to Margate than those passing through Westgate 😉

  27. PS as the wicked witch sadly apparantly moved here 10years ago, and wontergardens was listed in 2008, that would appear to have given the wicked witch some 5 years of whining to achieve her objective. Maths also seems to be an issue for you James, no wonder you are SO piss poor as an amatuer accountant, and why you get all pissy when you’re exposed as the lying fuckwit you are 🙂

    • who told you she moved here 10 years ago hammy?
      btw TDC conservation team had it listed in aug-sept 2008 along with the Lido and the Nayland Rock shelter. what Louise set up after September 2008 was a Conservation AREA group independant of TDC and has nothing to do with listed building status and the LIDO isnt even in the “Conservation AREA”

      • She claims to have moved here in June 2008, but as her first ‘Margate Architecture’ blog post was on 7th September 2007 I suspect she means June 2007…

      • I expect it would be easier to ask her but I suspect she meant permanent move was 2008 and before that she moved between 2 areas as she is on the Electoral Roll from 2007 either way that isn’t 10 years. I expect hammy’s research is sadly lacking or he cannot add up

  28. Good idea Peter, the wicked witch has ensured the Lido has no future, I would be happy to see something replacing it, and making use fo a great site

  29. What a disaster for Thanet that was Oldfield, feel free to fuck off back where you came from any time won’t you 🙂

    Funny, you’d think that someone sticking her nose into everyone’s business, and dragging people who want Thanet to move forward, into court, while contributing exactly fuck all, would have been in the area longer than that.

      • In my case, not in a million years. She contributes nothing except costing TDC cash, preventing progress, and making a london lawyer richer, she is simply a parasite.

        I don;t know what else you have contributed apart from your art Peter, so wouldn’t feel qualified to comment, except to say, you are CERTAIN to have contributed more than the wicked witch ever will 🙂

    • “Funny, you’d think that someone sticking her nose into everyone’s business, and dragging people who want Thanet to move forward, into court, while contributing exactly fuck all, would have been in the area longer than that.” so is that an admission you got it wrong the hammy 🙂

      • It’s a comment James, are you unaware of what a comment is? I wonder if my quoting a source that may or my not, (as i don;t believe a word Oldfield says) be correct is in teh same league as you posting what you knew were lies, before you were forced to remove them 😉

        Try harder James, a LOT harder 😉

      • maybe you need to check your facts before you post
        1. accusing Louise Oldfield of getting the Winter Gardens and Lido listed
        2. Oldfield has lived here 10 years

        Wrong for 1 and wrong for 2
        You must learn to research better hammy

  30. Hmmm, does w=one have to live in an area to interfere with it’s progress, how entertaining, Oldfield was causing Thanet issues before even darkening it’s door.

    I would be impressed by her whining about Thanet, and the rousing support she enjoys, but just like Driver, the people of Thanet, quite rightly, gave her a resounding FUCK OFF at the KCC elections.

    Let’s hope one day she will mind her own business for a change.

  31. No no James, *sigh*

    1. There is only Oldfield’s word for that, worth nothing

    2. source possibly incorrect, Oldfield’s word for that again, worth nothing,.

    Now shall we yet again examine your record,

    1. claims made about a prominent Kent company, proved as lies James was forced to remove – James proved a liar

    2. innuendo that developers in Ramsgate have broken the law – No evidence whatsoever produced – James proved a liar

    3. innuendo that TDC councillors are corrupt – No evidence whatsoever produced – James proved a liar

    That’s just three I can be bothered to post.

    Your a lying cunt James, proven time and time again, that’s why you hide in groups where you can be heavily protected 😉

    I would say you are a 3 time loser, but you’re WAY beyond that boy 😉

    • “that’s why you hide in groups where you can be heavily protected ;)”
      Hide? then why are you posting here without censorship?
      So how am I protected from all the BS you post.

      BTW the Electoral Roll is a legal document so again you are wrong.

  32. “Barry James on September 17, 2013 at 23:22 said:

    I expect it would be easier to ask her but I suspect she meant permanent move was 2008 and before that she moved between 2 areas as she is on the Electoral Roll from 2007″

    ” Louise Oldfield @margatearchi

    Dear John Hamilton, I moved to Margate in June 2008. Thanks for your interest”

    seems your talking bollocks and Oldfield is being economical with the truth James, what a shock 😉

    Seems if the electoral roll is a legal document, Oldfield has abused it, or you are simply lying yet AGAIN james.

    Where is your pet mutt Barnes these days. has even he abandoned you….

    • Still here, watching John making an utter fool of himself.

      John is proven wrong, his response? Splutter, bluster, INSULT!

      As you say Barry, he can’t respond to the actual arguments so just resorts to insulting the person, which is a clear sign of having lost.

      John really has a bee in his bonnet about people in Thanet not being from Thanet, doesn’t he? Which is funny, because he says that he’s from London originally. I mean, just where is this “Boundary of Acceptability” which people are *not* permitted to move across? How far away are you allowed to live from Thanet and move here then be considered welcome (by people who have also moved here from elsewhere)? 30 miles? 40 miles? 100 miles?

      And who gets to decide that anyway?

      And how long does someone have to live in Thanet before the insults about where they came from stop?

      Or maybe it’s all just one huge cover-up for John’s massive insecurities and as was said, he can’t respond to the arguments made by the person so resorts to attacking the person.

  33. Oh bless, James’s attack mutt returns to try to defend poor ole James, and as usual fails completely. It’s like watching a live show of dumb and dumber 🙂

    • so which is it hammy
      “Dear John Hamilton, I moved to Margate in June 2008” Louise
      “PS as the wicked witch sadly apparantly moved here 10years ago” Hamilton

      Sadly you fail to do any research and make a fool of yourself again.

  34. Which is it James;

    “BTW the Electoral Roll is a legal document so again you are wrong”
    “she is on the Electoral Roll from 2007″
    “Louise Oldfield – Dear John Hamilton, I moved to Margate in June 2008”

    So who is lying James, you as usual, or Oldfield, seems your standard of “evidence” is as piss poor as usual, and you are caught in yet ANOTHER lie 🙂

    Sadly you once again prove yourself to be the lying you are so infamous for being, and displaying you can’t be trusted with simple facts.

    • hammy so you are caught in a lie ““PS as the wicked witch sadly apparantly moved here 10years ago”
      seems you make statements without any evidence!
      are you saying 2007 or 2008 is 10 years ago seems maths not your forte either.

      • Seeing as John conveniently forgets that he himself moved to Ramsgate, but seems to think that anyone else who has the temerity to move to Thanet after having been born elsewhere should be subject to ridicule, insult and innuendo, I wouldn’t expect a logical or coherent response from him.

        It’s like him telling me to “go away” and “shut the fuck up” on my own blog. He really just doesn’t understand…

  35. Perhaps you missed the question my precious lying lil cunt 😉

    Which is it James;

    “BTW the Electoral Roll is a legal document so again you are wrong”
    “she is on the Electoral Roll from 2007″
    “Louise Oldfield – Dear John Hamilton, I moved to Margate in June 2008″

    Or perhaps you have the balls to repeat the lies Cardy’s forced you to remove 😉

    So who is lying James, you as usual, or Oldfield, don’t forget “the Electoral Roll is a legal document ” seems your standard of “evidence” is as piss poor as usual, and you are caught in yet ANOTHER lie 🙂

    • I did what you did hammy shall I remind you of your allegations made 1st.
      Oldfield had the Lido and Winter gardens listed = wrong
      Oldfield moved here 10 years ago – wrong

      I suspect you forget you were challenged on these accusations made by you (or maybe you didnt forget)

      Maybe while you are about it post the evidence that I was forced to remove anything (then again I doubt you can)
      This is more a case of accusing someone of doing what you regularly do, that is posting BS without any evidence.
      You want me to post the listing dates again along with the date you say Louise moved here?

      • Barry,

        “she is on the Electoral Roll from 2007″
        “Louise Oldfield – Dear John Hamilton, I moved to Margate in June 2008″

        Explanation: a simple typo on Louise’s part (what with the 7 and 8 being next to each other on a keyboard).

        “the wicked witch sadly apparantly moved here 10years ago, and wontergardens was listed in 2008, that would appear to have given the wicked witch some 5 years of whining to achieve her objective”

        Explanation: the moronic ramblings of a demented, pathological liar who can’t accept simple maths or evidence which contradicts his preferred weltanschauung (lit. world view). Along with some simple typos on his part (like “apparantly” and “wontergardens”).

        Geoff.

  36. Let me remind you of your latest lies and BS yet AGAIN James;

    Which is it James;

    “BTW the Electoral Roll is a legal document so again you are wrong”
    “she is on the Electoral Roll from 2007″
    “Louise Oldfield – Dear John Hamilton, I moved to Margate in June 2008″

    If you weren’t forced to remove your lies re Cardy’s James, (which you clearly were) why did you remove them I wonder..

    • Tip 1 : Never resort to name calling – even if your opponent does. You must attack your opponent’s argument – not their person. As soon as you begin to criticize your opponent, it becomes obvious that you have run out of ways to defend your view. These types of insults (ad hominem) are a sure way to lose a debate. You should be pleased if your opponent resorts to this feeble attempt to escape the real debate as it means you are close to victory.

  37. And yet I simply asked you for an explanation of your lies in this thread, and those you posted prior to that. Seems that (as usual) I enjoy victory, you move further from credibility post by post James.

    Let me remind you of your latest lies and BS yet AGAIN James;

    Which is it James;

    “BTW the Electoral Roll is a legal document so again you are wrong”
    “she is on the Electoral Roll from 2007″
    “Louise Oldfield – Dear John Hamilton, I moved to Margate in June 2008″

    If you weren’t forced to remove your lies re Cardy’s James, (which you clearly were) why did you remove them I wonder..

    • I’ll keep this simple as I know you can’t cope with anything more complicated.
      Let me remind you of your latest lies and BS yet AGAIN hammy

      “PPPS It’s unlikely the Lido site will EVER be developed. Simple fact is that as the wicked witch of the north decided it should be listed, it would now be WAY to expensive and WAY to difficult to do anything with it.”

      “as the wicked witch sadly apparantly moved here 10years ago, and wontergardens was listed in 2008, that would appear to have given the wicked witch some 5 years of whining to achieve her objective.”

      according to your post she moved here in 2008 so how is that 10 years?

      I suggest you get back on your wheel and do something productive for once

  38. Once again James you post a whole lot of drivel, but all you prove is that you have lied, and are trying to hide it all over again.

    “Louise Oldfield – Dear John Hamilton, I moved to Margate in June 2008″

    So it would seem all your posturing is the usual worthless bollocks as either you’re lying, or the wicked witch of the north is.which is it james..

    The rest of your volumous posts appear to prove nothing whatsoever, so, to return to the question you are so afraid to answer;

    If you weren’t forced to remove your lies re Cardy’s James, (which you clearly were) why did you remove them I wonder..

    • So sad, So Boring and so much laziness. You really are missing the point.

      As Checkers said earlier “Erm, I think you’re the one who claimed that it was Louise Oldfield who was behind the listing of The Lido, and James proved you wrong…” Resorting to the same twaddle shows you really don’t get it.

  39. There is no effort to expose you as the blatant liar you are known to be James.

    That you are sad boring and lonely is clearly beyond question, that you think you have proved something is somewhat amusing, when it seems that you make many statements you claim as fact, when they are clearly bullshit. Some illustrations will follow, along with the question you are SO afraid to answer.

    Which is it James;

    “BTW the Electoral Roll is a legal document so again you are wrong”
    “she is on the Electoral Roll from 2007″
    “Louise Oldfield – Dear John Hamilton, I moved to Margate in June 2008″

    If you weren’t forced to remove your lies re Cardy’s James, (which you clearly were) why did you remove them I wonder..

    The only thing you have proved thus far James, is what we already knew, you’re a lying fucktard 🙂

    • The trouble with you anon types is getting your information as you cannot just phone the person with the answers. In your case it is obvious that the answers aren’t what you crave otherwise you would have crawled away by now. So what’s in it for you. Is it the desire to be famous> is it the desire to have your name in lights? Do you get a thrill from looking at the words you put on the screen? Trolling for you seems to be getting people to respond to your questions so it really must get you that the question of Cardy never gets answered. Have you ever considered you are going about it the wrong way?
      Most people with a moral compass would never do what you do and I’m realising you behave more like Latchford, Hart, and Driver than any normal person. Have you considered a life in politics perhaps?

  40. Answers James? You don;t do answers my boy, you do lies followed by bullshit 😉

    I want answers James, that’s why i continue to challenge your bullshit and lies, as I know you have no answers, just more lies and bullshit.

    Trolling, no James, just challenging and exposing a lying fucktard 🙂

    Once again my boy,

    Which is it James;

    “BTW the Electoral Roll is a legal document so again you are wrong”
    “she is on the Electoral Roll from 2007″
    “Louise Oldfield – Dear John Hamilton, I moved to Margate in June 2008″

    If you weren’t forced to remove your lies re Cardy’s James, (which you clearly were) why did you remove them I wonder..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s