Consistency: Certainly not one of Hamilton’s strong points

Now I realise this probably won’t be a surprise to most, but John Hamilton’s deficiencies now include consistency. Much has been made on the Thanet blogs of an email from Mike Stannard of Cardy’s to Thanet District Council. John rubbished Ian Driver’s blog post about it on his own blog, with John being highly disparaging of anyone lending the email any credence:


Interesting, then, that in the comments section of my very own blog John seems to have discarded the notion that the email isn’t genuine and actually seems to have embraced it as being accurate:


On his own blog, John has determined how anyone believing any part of that email to be genuine should be considered. Seeing as John has publicly stated that he believes at least part of the email to be genuine, it’s obvious how John wishes himself to be referred to.


30 thoughts on “Consistency: Certainly not one of Hamilton’s strong points

  1. Bless, I have to feel sorry for you Barnes, you really have very little grasp of intelligent exchanges with your betters, hence why your understanding of posts is somewhat childishly literal, are you autistic?

    Driver, my dishonest little bandwagon jumper, tell us, which is it, is the mail your monkey gave you refering to your incompetent minion James, are you simply promoting a a mail you know to be false because you haven;t had any decent media coverage recently, or are you simply blustering over something you simply don’t understand?

    While we have you posting, can tell the residents of your ward, who voted for you when you dishonestly promoted yourself as a Labour candidate, why having embraced then kicked 3 political groups, and being humiliated at the KCC elections, why it is you feel you shouldn’t be forced to face the electorate you lied to so blatantly at a by election? I thought you stop for open government, and if that’s true, why did you lie to get elected, and continue to abuse the process by sitting cuckoo like in your ward, with no mandate from anyone.

    I know you don;t have the balls to answer that OR face your electorate, but hey, only got to put up with your bullshit till the next election thank fuck! You’ll probably be UKIP by then πŸ˜‰

    • Guess we can add “autism” to the list of things John tries to use as insults and of things he doesn’t understand. Shame on him for ridiculing those with autism.

      John has once again been caught out making a massive fool of himself, so how does he respond? Ah yes, belittling comments and insult.

      If John were a better man he’d stand by his own words, admit when he was wrong and agree that others can have valid viewpoints differing from his own. Sadly, all he can do is bleat and whine and act like a little child caught in a blatant lie. Even Facebook agrees, hence why they removed his false accusations (something which John seems single-minded in avoiding any references to).

  2. I must admit, it isn’t nice to to intimate that anyone is as worthless as you Barnes. I still await the day when I post anything inaccurate, never happened yet my boy πŸ˜‰

    Still nothing from you Driver, what a shock. It seems you are only brave when seeking media attention from a viewpoint on the backs of disabled children.

  3. Sadly Barnes that link just takes people to a clueless cunt making making claims about facebook procedures he doesn’t understand.

    Seems doing a “job” piss poorly is the only thing you and James do well, and poor ole Scott has no clue, poor lil failed occutard πŸ™‚

    • Seems John is now taking the ostrich approach:

      “Facebook didn’t remove my post! In FACT, what post? I never said Scott was a racist on Facebook so Facebook couldn’t have removed it, could they!”

      Obviously John looks at a different Facebook to the rest of the planet. The one in his head. And what an horrific place that would be.

  4. Oh bless, poor ole Barnes not waits for my every word, he then spouts a stream of laughable bollocks to make us all laugh at him.

    Facebook sadly auto-remove remarks which are inaccurately complained about, even the most worthless dullard knows that, clearly Barnes is not as bright as that.

    Clearly Scott IS a racist, I don;t know why you’d think your betters would deny that Barnes,.

    Clearly my approach is more humiliate and expose useless cunts such as Barnes and James, and racists such as Scott and I do it with great skill, simply using the truth and facts. Perhaps you should look up those words Barnes, no point in asked that worthless cock sucker James πŸ˜‰

    • I was right, John is looking at the Facebook in his head rather than the one everyone else uses. From Facebook’s own page on reporting content:

      “Note that reporting something to Facebook doesn’t guarantee that it will be removed. You may see something you don’t like on Facebook that doesn’t violate the Facebook Terms.”

      This is quite aside from the fact that an organisation like Facebook would never in a million years “auto-remove remarks”, otherwise half of Facebook would disappear overnight as tit-for-tat wars escalated beyond control.

      Unless, of course, John can provide a link to or a screenshot of Facebook’s auto-removal policy? I’m waiting…

  5. Sadly Barnes, you are just displaying your stunning ignorance of the way FB operates, and frankly, you are WAY to stupid for me to spend educating.

    Enjoy the wait, perhaps you should hold your breath, the outcome of that would be very worthwhile πŸ™‚


    • hammy your continual posting of me being “forced” to remove posts is more BS from you. you set great store that your cut through BS on your blog yet I see absolutely no proof posted anywhere that your allegation has any proof attached. So if you are a “man of your word” (lol) the post proof anywhere you like. I await this with eager anticipation. Your own blog says “talking sense and cutting through bullshit” it doesn’t say “talking bullshit” does it!!

    • Brilliant. John proves not only that he lies and makes things up and tries to misrepresent them as fact (with no qualifying evidence for his ludicrous claims) but has also proven that he can’t read.

      John is now arguing with Facebook that he knows their own policies and procedures better than they do and that only he knows how they actually work (even though the method he presents is completely based on his own conjecture, has no basis in fact and is totally unrealistic and goes against Facebook’s own stated policy).


  6. Now then James, it seems you are spouting more bullshit, let me help you my worthless lil cocksucker.

    YOU posted libelous/slanderous inaccurate comments about Cardy’s on Michaels blog. Now, some time later, all of them were deleted and every trace removed. Now assuming that Michael didn;t delete them, (you have already confirmed elsewhere he didn’t πŸ˜‰ ) , it was either you or the toothfairy.

    As we know, you revel in posting inaccurate laughable bullshit so you would have quite happily left the latest of your bullshit there for all to see. As we have established, YOU must have deleted it, and as you are more than comfortable to post lies and innuendo as “fact” I think it’s more than obvious that you were quite rightly forced to remove your bullshit.

    Perhaps you should learn how to carry out a proper investigation, and post some facts, that way you won;t be humiliated by the victims of your bullshit, and your betters such as me who expose your bullshit for what it is, and you as the lying cunt you have been proved to be πŸ˜‰

    • John’s proven he can’t even read Facebook’s own removal policies (and says that he knows them better than Facebook themselves), so John’s ability to recall any kind of wording must surely be in question. He can’t even agree with himself for crying out loud!

      Only one person has so far been proven to have had their “lies and innuendo” forcibly removed and that was John Hamilton, by Facebook. Note how John has no proof of his accusations against you, Barry, so resorts once again to vicious insult. It really does destroy any shred of a chance of John being taken seriously when he can’t stop the latest spew of bile from gushing forth.

  7. Barnes, when I am addressing you, I shall let you know by calling you “oi fucktard” Until then, feel free to STFU there’s a good boy, you add fuck all πŸ˜‰

    James, As we know, you are more than happy to post bullshit lying claim after bullshit lying claim, yet this time you delete all your lying dishonest posts containing the lies you posted re Cardy’s.

    Now, if you weren’t forced to remove them (which you clearly were πŸ˜‰ ) why pray tell would you remove the lies you posted, while leaving all the rest of your lies intact….

    Your a lying cunt James, you prove it daily post by post πŸ™‚

  8. Now James my boy, I way prefer the opinion of real people rather than those who don;t even have the courage to use their own names, though of course as you prove daily, you’re fucking stupid enough to believe anything, no matter that there is not a shred of evidence to support your laughable claims, as proved when you were forced to remove your lies re Cardy’s.

    “William EppsSeptember 07, 2013 5:53 pm
    I can understand someone finding John Hamilton hard to take because he does not pull his punches, although his usual targets ask for all they get”

    Now James, stop whining like a bitch, and answer the question you’ve been asked….

    James, As we know, you are more than happy to post bullshit lying claim after bullshit lying claim, yet this time you delete all your lying dishonest posts containing the lies you posted re Cardy’s.

    Now, if you weren’t forced to remove them (which you clearly were πŸ˜‰ ) why pray tell would you remove the lies you posted, while leaving all the rest of your lies intact….

    Your a lying cunt James, you prove it daily post by post πŸ™‚

    • John’s returned to his usual tactic of copy/pasting the same old phrase over and over, I see. The last resort of the utterly defeated is to just copy/paste their previous inaccuracies in the hope that some of what they write will stick in the minds of those less able or willing to actually verify facts for themselves.

      • how many times does it take before you get it hammy. NO ONE made me do anything. btw hammy what posts? can you tell me again what lies I am alleged to have said. before you answer do some research and look at Cardy on Duedil

  9. “you see something on Facebook that you believe violates our terms, you should report it to us. Please keep in mind that reporting a piece of content does not guarantee that it will be removed from the site.

    Because of the diversity of our community, it’s possible that something could be disagreeable or disturbing to you without meeting the criteria for being removed or blocked. For this reason, we also offer personal controls over what you see, such as the ability to hide or quietly cut ties with people, Pages, or applications that offend you.” autoremoval ha ha ha get a life hammy

    • No doubt this is the point at which John tells us he used to work for Facebook, we don’t understand their own clearly stated policies, in fact even Facebook don’t understand their own policies. Apparently only John knows how Facebook works, but amazingly can’t offer a single shred of evidence to back this up…

  10. James, you’re a proven lying cunt, hence your protestations mean nothing all the time you refuse to answer a very simple and very basic question, hence why like the petulant child you act like, you must be asked again again again until you answer like a good boy.

    I have no intention of reposting the slander and lies you Cardy’s forced you to remove, I have more personal integrity than that. So, once again, if you weren’t forced to remove them (which you clearly were πŸ˜‰ ) why pray tell would you remove the lies you posted, while leaving all the rest of your lies intact….

    About the only thing you excel in is your ignorance of FB. Tell us all again about FB removing people from groups, and having a VAST army of people personally checking the whiny protestations of dumb useless fucktards such as Scott HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA James, you really are the most worthless piece of human sewage I have EVER encountered πŸ™‚ No wonder you only post where you are heavily protected!

    Your a lying cunt James, you prove it daily post by post πŸ™‚

    • Haha, brilliant. John keeps banging on and on about how he’s provided proof, but in reality he actually hasn’t. All he does is make stuff up and hope that if he keeps posting, some people might start believing him.

      Seeing as John keeps ignoring all the proof offered to counter his ludicrous claims about Facebook “auto-removal”, I’m of the opinion that John isn’t actually aware of the concept of proof.

      He *says* he’s “proven” things, but actually hasn’t, then denies the existence of proof when it is actually delivered by others. Therefore, he doesn’t actually know what proof is or what it’s supposed to look like.

      And he’s the only one so far proven to be a liar. Guess we can add ‘delusional’ to that as well now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s